SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, M.SHREESHA
Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Samiksha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner for Acharya Vinobha Bhave Hospital:Mr. Prakash d. Meghe, Advocate
For the Respondent for Kum Samiksha (Complainant):Mr. Amol N. Suryawanshi, Advocate
For the Insurance Company:Mr. A.K. Prasad, Advocate

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member

Challenge in these Revision Petitions under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act (in short “the Act”) is to the common order dated 04.12.2014, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench Nagpur (in short “the State Commission”) in Appeal Nos.477, 548 and 672 of 2008 preferred by Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “the Hospital”), New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Insurance Company”) and Ku. Samiksha D/o Sachin Kokadwar (hereinafter referred to as “the Patient”) respectively. By the impugned order, the State Commission has dismissed all the three Appeals confirming the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Wardha (in short “the District Forum”).

2. The facts in brief are that the Patient, aged 3 years, D/o Shri Sachin Kokadwar was taken to the Hospital on 02.03.2004 with a complaint of fever and was admitted as an indoor patient from 02.03.2004 to 05.03.2004 as she was diagnosed to be suffering from Brancho pneumonia. As the fever

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top