SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Citizen Cooperative Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Amalpushp Shroti, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Maibam N. Singh, Advocate

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member

The complainant before this Commission is a cooperative bank presently under liquidation. It is alleged in para 2 of the complaint that this is a statutory obligation of the bank to get its premises as well as its employees insured and ever since it has been established the bank has been taking insurance.

2. The complainant took an insurance policy from the OP, namely, United India Insurance Co. for the period from 30.6.2004 to 29.6.2005. Though the policy was issued on 5.7.2004, it was effective from 30.6.2004. The sum insured under the policy was as under:-

“Sl. No.

Cover

Sum Insured (Rs)

1.

Basic Sum Insured

7,00,000.00

2.

Additional SI on premises

2,27,00,000.00

3.

Additional SI on Transit

95,00,000.00”

3. The case of the complainant is that it suffered a loss of Rs.2,34,56,944.59 during the policy period on account of acts of fraud and embezzlement committed by its employees. The said embezzlement is alleged to have been committed by three persons, namely, the CEO of the bank – Mr. Hargovind Yadav, its Bra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top