SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nina Sudhir Thackersey – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Dr. Sushil Kr. Gupta and Mr. Ganesh Khanna, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Satvik Varma, Ms. Seema Sundd, Ms. Shweta Priyadarsini, Mr. Ritu Raj and Mr. Snehil Srivastava, Advocates

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Member

Heard learned counsel for the appellant – insurance co. and the respondent – complainant, and perused the material on record.

2. The case relates to repudiation of a claim made under an overseas mediclaim insurance policy.

3. In the interest of justice, and for adjudication of the first appeal on merit, on facts and law, the self-admitted delay of 20 days in filing the instant first appeal is condoned.

4. The State Commission partly allowed the complaint vide its Order dated 10.05.2012 and held deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the insurance co.:

Surely, Opponent NOs. 1 and 2, in the circumstances, were guilty of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in repudiating the claim of the complainant. We, therefore, record our finding on the point No. 1 in the negative.

Point

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top