DEEPA SHARMA, C.VISWANATH
Kulwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of Patiala – Respondent
ORDER
All these three revision petitions will be disposed of by the common order as the same arise out of a common order of the State Commission dated 21.8.2012 by which appeals of the petitioners were dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that three persons, namely, Amarjit Singh, Shamsher Singh and Vikramjeet Singh (hereinafter called as loanees) applied for sanction house loan. An amount of Rs.8,13,789/- was sanctioned to them. The sanctioned amount was to be disbursed in three installments of Rs.2,40,000/-, Rs.3,20,000/- and Rs.2,40,000/- and was to be credited in the joint account of the loanees. Two installments of sanctioned loan amount of Rs.2,40,000/- and Rs.3,20,000/- were disbursed to the loanees. The respondent also sanctioned Rs.13,789/- in their loan account as premium of SBI insurance policy which was calculated on the basis of youngest loanee. At the time when the loan was sanctioned the premium was calculated on the total amount of Rs.8,13,789/-, means that it also calculated the amount sanctioned as a premium of SBI insurance policy. One of the loanee i.e. Vikramjit Singh, the youngest among the loanee, expired on 13.1.2009 during the loan repayment period. As
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.