SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Universal Infrastructure – Appellant
Versus
Binay Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advocate

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member

The complainants / respondents booked a residential apartment with the appellant in a project, which the appellant was to develop in Sector 104 of Mohali. Flat No. 702, in the project namely ‘Taj Towers’ was allotted to the complainants, for a total consideration of Rs.59,85,000/-, which was later increased to Rs.65,10,000/-. The booking was made in May, 2012. The complainants made a payment of Rs.34,50,000/- to the appellant. The possession of the allotted flat was offered to the complainants vide letter dated 22.1.2016. The appellant, while offering possession also demanded a sum of Rs.18,00,000/- from the complainants towards interest for the delayed payments. The complainants informed the appellants vide letter dated 30.5.2016 that they were willing to pay the balance amount at the time of delivery of possession, but the appellants insisted on payment of the balance amount before delivering possession of the flat. The complainants thereafter, approached the concerned State Commission by way of a consumer complaint, seeking refund of the amount paid by them to the appellants with compensation etc.

2. The complaint was resisted by the appellants, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top