S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
Sachhikant Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Vikash Singh – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S. M. Kantikar, Presiding Member
The dispute in the instant revision petition relates to alleged medical negligence against the opposite party-doctor.
2. The allegation was that the doctor did not perform the surgery for removal of gall stone.
3. The District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the OP to pay Rs.59,000/- along with interest @10% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint.
4. Being aggrieved, the OP-doctor filed the first appeal before the State Commission. The State Commission allowed the appeal and consequently, the complaint was dismissed.
5. Being aggravated by the impugned order of State Commission the complainant filed this instant revision petition.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner at the admission stage.
7. Learned counsel submitted that the complainant, Sachhikant Tripathi, (for short ‘the patient’) underwent operation for removal of gall bladder stone. It was performed by Dr. Vikash Singh/OP in his private clinic at Ara. The patient did not get sufficient relief and he was suffering continuous abdominal pain, thence, approached the OP-doctor. Few blood tests and ultrasonography (USG) of abdomen were performed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.