SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Anil Arora – Appellant
Versus
IREO Victory Valley Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Swaty Singh Malik and Ms. Parnita, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. P. Vinay Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member

The complainants who are husband and wife applied to the OP for the allotment of a residential flat in a project, namely, ‘Ireo Victory Valley’, which the opposite parties were developing in Sector-67 of Gurgaon. Vide allotment letter dated 13.9.2010, flat No.A-0503 in the above-referred project was allotted to them for a total sale price of Rs.20083200/-. The parties then executed an agreement on 20.9.2010, incorporating their respective obligations. The price of the flat was to be paid in installments linked with stage of construction. The said payment plan reads as under:-

Linked Stages

Basic Sale Price %

Others

Basic

Others

Total

At the time of booking

9.61%

 

1929870.00

 

1929870.00

Within 45 days of booking

9.61%

 

1929870.00

 

1929870.00

On commencement of exaction

7.60%

50% EDC

1525852.50

513015.93

2038868.43

Casting of Basement Roof slab

7.60%

50% EDC

1525852.50

513015.93

2038868.43

Casting of 1st Floor Roof slab

7.60%

50% IDC

15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top