What is the legality of a joint agreement among OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3 to restrict new movie releases to pre-designated theatres? What is the liability of OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3 under Section 3(3)(b) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 for restricting/controlling the supply of films? What is the remedy or penalty under Section 53-B for anti-competitive cartelisation in this case?

Key Points: - The Addl. DG found that OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3 formed a cartel to restrict new releases to 70 release stations, limiting competition (!) (!) (!) . - The Commission held that the conduct violated Section 3(3)(b) read with Section 3(1) and that the agreement restricting releases was anti-competitive (!) (!) - (!) . - Evidence included inquiries, affidavits, media reports, and written submissions showing coercive pressure from KFEF on distributors to deny releases to IP members (!) - (!) (!) - (!) . - The tribunal upheld the Addl. DG findings and imposed penalties on Appellants and Respondent No.3, and issued cease and desist orders (!) - (!) (!) - (!) . - The final order: Final Result: Dismissed (appeal) with affirmation of the impugned order and penalties, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and regulatory procedures (!) .

What is the legality of a joint agreement among OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3 to restrict new movie releases to pre-designated theatres?

What is the liability of OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3 under Section 3(3)(b) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 for restricting/controlling the supply of films?

What is the remedy or penalty under Section 53-B for anti-competitive cartelisation in this case?