SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, M.SHREESHA
Narender Gupta – Appellant
Versus
DLF Limited – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Aditya Parolia and Ms. Harishita Chauhan, Advocates with Complainant in person
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Pniniki Misra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Mr. Ritu Raj, Mr. Aditya P.N. Singh and Mr. Kamal Taneja, Advocates

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member—This Consumer Complaint is filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by the Complainant against the Opposite Party seeking the following reliefs:-

“i. Direct the respondents to immediately hand over the physical possession of the flat in question duly furnished in all respects as per agreement immediately;

ii. Direct the respondents to provide on time payment rebate of Rs.1500/- per sq. ft. on the total area of the flat in a manner as may be deemed just and equitable by the Hon’ble commission;

iii. To adjust/refund as the position emerges, an amount of parking charges of Rs.22,50,000/- wrongfully and illegal collected against the provisions of law.

iv. Direct the opposite party to provide to the complainant the complete calculations and details of GST benefit granted to flat owners based on the complete audit done by the state statutory auditor and make a copy of such certificate available to the complainant and accordingly adjust/refund the final amount.

v. Direct the respondent to provide refund/ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top