SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, M.SHREESHA
Kamalabai Vishnu Khodse – Appellant
Versus
Kamalabai Vishnu Khodse – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. N.B. Deshkukh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Jayant Chitnis, Advocate

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member—Challenge in these two Revision Petitions filed by the Petitioners/Complainants, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), is to the order dated 09.01.2015 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal Nos. 163 & 186 of 2010. By the impugned order, the State Commission has reversed the order dated 23.11.2009, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Beed (for short “the District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 200 of 2007, and allowed First Appeal No. 163 of 2010 filed by Dr. Yashwant Bhanudas Khose/Opposite Party No.1 (for short, the “treating Doctor”) and consequently dismissed the First Appeal No.186 of 2010 filed by the Complainants seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the District Forum. The District Forum, while holding the treating Doctor guilty of medical negligence and deficiency in service, has directed him to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation on account of death of the first Complainant’s son, namely, Shaliwahan@ Pintu (for short, “the patient”).

2. The Complaint w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top