SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Pankaj Malik – Appellant
Versus
Ireo Victory Valley Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Ms. Vrinda Kapoor and Ms. Urvi Kuthiala, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Ms. Renu Gupta, Mr. Aksheya Ganpath and Ms. Aismalya S., Advocates

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—On 6.8.2010, the complainant applied to the OP for allotment of a residential flat in a project, namely, ‘Ireo Victory Valley’, which the opposite parties were developing in Sector-67 of Gurgaon. Vide allotment letter dated 17.8.2010, flat No.B-0503 in the above-referred project was allotted to him for a total sale price of Rs.20896128/-. The parties then executed an agreement on 6.7.2011 incorporating their respective obligations. The price of the flat was to be paid in installments linked with stage of construction. The said payment plan reads as under:-

“Linked Stages

Basic Sale Price %

Others

Basic

Others

Total

At the time of booking

9.58%

 

1788660.00

 

1788660.00

Within 45 days of booking

9.58%

 

1788660.00

 

1788660.00

On commencement of exaction

7.61%

50% EDC

1419945.00

513015.93

1932960.93

Casting of Basement Roof slab

7.61%

50% EDC

1419945.00

513015.93

1932960.93

Casting of 1st Floor Roof slab

7.61%

50% IDC

1419945.00

42598.35

1462543.35

Cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top