SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, C.VISWANATH
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Manjunath Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advocate

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member—The present Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the order dated 28.02.2019 of the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Banglore (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.484 of 2015 filed by the Petitioner whereby its Appeal against the order dated 23.04.2015 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ghitradurga (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.56 of 2014 was partly allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Respondent (hereinafter called as “Complainant”), purchased the policy under the name of Jeevan Anand from the Petitioner on 28.03.2010 and the sum assured was Rs.10 Lakhs. The premium was payable half-yearly. The contention of the Complainant was that he had paid 5 premiums of Rs.44,763/- each within stipulated period. Due to his cardiac related problem, he could not pay the premium in the month of September 2012. He remained hospitalized from 05.12.2012 to 15.12.2012 and also underwent by-pass surgery and thereafter, he was on complete rest on the advice of the Doctor. After his recovery, he approached the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top