SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Rajiv Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Unitech Limited – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Vaibhav Mahajan and Mr. Siddhant Gupta, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Varun Katyal and Ms. Chitra, Advocates

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainants namely Rajiv Shankar and Geeta Shankar booked a residential flat with the opposite party in a project namely ‘Unitech South Park, which the opposite party was to develop in Sector Gurgaon, Haryana. Vide allotment letter dated 04.6.2013, Flat No.0504, Block C-2, 5th floor (Customer Code No. USP0705) in the above referred project was allotted to them for a consideration of Rs.1,27,06,746/-. The parties then executed a Buyers Agreement on 28.6.2013, incorporating their respective obligations in respect of the said allotment. In terms of the Clause 4(a)(i) of the said agreement, the possession was to be delivered within thirty six months thereof, meaning thereby that the possession ought to have been offered by 28.6.2016. The grievance of the complainants is that the possession has not been offered and even the construction is not complete, despite they having already paid Rs.1,14,88,119/- to the OP.

2. The OP did not file its written version despite service on 27.10.2018 and therefore its right to file the written version was closed on 27.2.2019. I have heard the learned counsel for the complainants and have considered the affid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top