SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH
ORS Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate and Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member—This Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’, challenging the Order dated 20.10.2016 in C.C. No. 72 of 2013 passed by The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’.

The Appellant herein, M/s ORS Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., was the Opposite Party before the State Commission, and is hereinafter being referred to as the ‘Builder Co.’.

The Respondent herein, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, was the Complainant before the State Commission, and is hereinafter being referred to as the ‘Complainant’.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Builder Co. on admission.

Perused the material on record, including inter alia the impugned Order dated 20.10.2016 of the State Commission and the Memorandum of Appeal.

3. This Appeal has been filed with self-admitted delay of 349 days. A mere perusal of the application for condonation of delay shows that the reasons stated therein point towards managerial inefficiency and perfunctory and causal attitude to the law of limitation, they are illogical and unpersuasive in explaining convincingly and cogently the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top