ORDER

Prem Narain, Presiding Member—This appeal has been filed by the appellant Mayfair Housing against the order dated 17.06.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in CC/14/372.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondents No.1-3/complainants have filed complaint against opponents for getting possession of flat from opponents alongwith interest on the amount paid on account of delayed possession alongwith cost and compensation. Complainants had booked Flat No.307 admeasuring 590.08 sq.ft. built-up area situated at 3rd floor of building named as “Daffodil” for total consideration of Rs.18,99,886/- with the appellant/opponent no.1 as per suggestion given by respondents Nos.4 & 5 opponent nos.2 and 3. It is the contention of complainants that although they had paid entire amount of sale consideration, the appellant/opponent no.1 has not given possession of flat to them. For payment of sale consideration complainants had obtained loan of Rs.14,30,000/- from respondent No.6/opponent no.4 and opponent no.4 had directly disbursed that amount to opponent no.1. Rest of the amount was paid by complainants to opponent