SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Somenath Karmakar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Gaytri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajashi Datta, Advocate

ORDER

These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against the order dated 22.3.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in FA No.759/2016 and FA No.760/2016.

RP No.2189 of 2018

2. The brief facts of this case are that the respondent/complainant is the husband of the deceased life assured (DLA). The proposal was filed on 28.02.2012 and the policy no.457228976, Jeevan Tarang started from 15.3.2012. The sum assured was Rs.5,00,000.

RP No.2190 of 2018

3. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant is the husband of the deceased life assured (DLA). In this case, the proposal was signed on 29.7.2013 and the policy No. 457650539, Jeevan Saral became effective from 30.7.2013. The sum assured was Rs.6.25 lacs.

4. Life assured died on 19.10.2014. The claims under the policies were filed by the complainant. However, the claims under the policy for Rs.6.25 lacs was repudiated on 21.1.2015 and the claim under the policy for Rs.5,00,000/- was repudiated on 26.2.2015 and the claims were repudiated on the ground that the DLA had not disclosed the material informa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top