SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Anurag Rufra @ Anurag Tiwary – Appellant
Versus
ABW Infrastructure Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Anup Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: Nemo

ORDER

Prem Narain, Presiding Member—This consumer complaint has been filed by the complainants Anurag Rudra @ Mr.Anurag Tiwary and anr. against the opposite parties M/s. ABW Infrastructure Ltd. & anr.

2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the opposite parties floated a scheme for purchase of “retail space” in the proposed IT park/gateway tower. The complainants jointly booked “retail spaces” having unit Nos.025,026 and 027 at ground floor admeasuring aggregate tentative total super area 3099 sq.ft. @Rs.8,680.85 per sq.ft. amounting to Rs.2,69,01,957/-. The complainants paid total amount of Rs.2,78,99,482/- including the service tax on 17.06.2013. The buyers’ agreement was executed on 17.06.2013. The period of competition was three years. The opposite parties under the scheme of “assured investment return plan” issued 28 post-dated cheques starting from June, 2013 till September, 2015 to each of the complainants after deducting TDS. The complainant received payment of assured return till August, 2015. The complainant also received the September, 2015 cheque but the same bounced. The complainant filed complaint before the competent court for the bouncing of cheque for Septembe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top