SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Jai Durga Pipe Store Through Its Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
Ranjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Dr S.S. Hooda, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ex parte

ORDER

Prem Narain, Presiding Member—This revision position has been filed by the petitioner M/s Jai Durga Pipe Store challenging the order dated 15th May 2015 passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh in appeal No. 1490 of 2011.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent complainant purchased PVC pipes from the petitioner/opposite party on 17th May 2009 by paying Rs.1,33,880/-. The pipes were purchased by weight and not in terms of length. There was no warranty given by the petitioner opposite party. The complainant has alleged that he further spent Rs. 2,50,364/- in digging and in fixing the pipes. The pipes were damaged and some holes developed in the pipe. It has further been alleged that the petitioner agreed to replace the pipes, however, nothing was done. The complainant then filed a consumer complaint before the District Forum and the same was dismissed wide order dated 23rd August 2011.

3. Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, the complainant then preferred an appeal before the State Commission and the State Commission vide the impugned order dated 15th May 2015 allowed the complaint and ordered refund of Rs.1,88,800/- alo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top