SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Deepshikha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms.Anusha Nagarajan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Amarjeet, Advocate.

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The petitioner invited applications for allotment of residential plots at Chandigarh. The complainant applied for allotment of a 100 sq. yds. Plot under category ‘A’ (General category) vide application No. 28758. She was declared successful in the draw of lot held on 28.11.2011. However, the allotment was later cancelled vide letter dated 31.05.2012 on the ground that she was not a resident of Punjab/Chandigarh which was an essential eligibility condition for allotment of the plot. Aggrieved from the cancellation of the allotment the complainant approached the concerned District Forum by way of a consumer complaint. The complaint was resisted on two grounds that the complainant was not eligible for the allotment of the plot, and that she was not a consumer of the petitioner.

2. Vide order dated 25.09.2012 the District Forum allowed the consumer complaint and restored the allotment. Compensation quantified at Rs. 50,000/- was also awarded to the complainant along-with cost of litigation quantified at Rs. 5,000/-.

3. Being aggrieved from the order passed by the District Forum, the petitioner approached the concerned State Commission by way of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top