ANUP K.THAKUR
Nirmal Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Bank Limited – Respondent
ORDER
Anup K Thakur, Presiding Member—It is proposed to dispose off R.P. Nos.4782 and 4783, both of 2013, vide a common order. Both these revision petitions arise out of the same order of the District Forum in C.C. No.996 of 2010 vide which the consumer complaint filed by the petitioner/complainant had been partly allowed, directing the respondents/OPs to refund Rs.20,603/- with interest @ 12 % from 9.4.2009 till the date of payment, with cost of Rs.2,000/-.
2. This order of the District Forum was challenged by both the complainant as well as the OPs.
3. F.A. No.315 of 2012, filed by the OPs, was allowed vide State Commission’s order dated 28.12.2012, and the District Forum’s order was set aside. Against this order of the State Commission, the complainant has filed R.P. No.4782 of 2013.
4. F.A. No.845 of 2012, filed by the complainant, seeking higher compensation, was dismissed by the State Commission vide order dated 22.3.2013, noting that the complainant had not challenged the order of the State Commission dated 28.12.2012 in F.A. No.315 of 2012, and therefore concluding that there was nothing more to be considered in the appeal. Against this, the complainant has filed R.P. No.4783
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.