SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH
IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ankitaben Manojbhai Neta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Reeva Gujral, Advocate

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 58 (1) (b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the ‘Act 2019’) [corresponding Section 21(b) of The Consume Protection Act, 1986 (the ‘Act 1986’)], in challenge to the Order dated 06.02.2020 of The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat (the ‘State Commission’) in F.A. No. 775 of 2015, arising out of the Order dated 17.07.2014 in C.C. No. 555 of 2013 of The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (Additional), Ahmedabad (the ‘District Forum’).

The Petitioner, IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd., was the Opposite Party before the District Forum (the ‘Insurance Co.’).

The Respondent, Ms. Ankitaben Manojbhai Neta, was the Complainant before the District Forum (the ‘Complainant’).

2. Heard arguments on admission from learned Counsel for the Insurance Co. on 06.01.2021.

Perused the material on record, including inter alia the Order dated 17.07.2014 of the District Forum, the impugned Order dated 06.02.2020 of the State Commission and the Petition.

3. The Petition has been filed with reported delay of 172 days.

In the interest of justice, to provide fair opportunity to the revisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top