DEEPA SHARMA
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Vallu Sowjanya – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (substituted now) (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Petitioner (hereinafter called as “the Insurance Company”) against the order dated 25.06.2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, A.P., Hyderabad (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.473 of 2012 whereby the Appeal of the State Bank of India against the order dated 15.05.2012 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ranga Reddy (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.10 of 2011, was dismissed.
2. The brief admitted facts of the case are that the complainant wanted to buy a house and he was sanctioned a loan amount of Rs.3,50,000/- which was repayable in 240 EMIs of Rs.3,320/-. He had cleared the entire loan amount and No Dues Certificate was also issued to him by the petitioner. The controversy between the parties had arisen when the complainant demanded the return of original sale deed. The petitioner had informed the complainant that he had never deposited the sale deed with the branch of the petitioner, who was processing the loan amount. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.