SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUP K.THAKUR
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Seetakanta Patnaik – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kishore Rawat and Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocates

ORDER

Anup K. Thakur, Presiding Member.—This Revision Petition No. 2045 of 2019 challenges the order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the State Consumer Redressal Commission, Odisha, Cuttack in First Appeal No. 394/2007. Vide this order, the State Commission had dismissed the appeal against the order of District Forum, Nabarangpur dated 14.12.2006 in C.D. Case No. 46/2006.

2. Briefly, the Complainant, Seetakanta Patnaik, owner of Truck No.AP -02-T-8512, had obtained it’s insurance cover from the petitioner/OP-Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (OP hereafter), for the period 09.06.2005 to 08.06.2006, vide policy no. 797/06. On 03.09.2005, the truck met with an accident at about 12:05 pm near village Kundraguda. A police case was registered vide Borigumma PS Case number 88. The said truck sustained substantial damage. As it was not in a position to run, it was loaded in another truck and shifted to Bhandar Gharani Engineering Garage, Nabarangpur, at a cost of Rs. 3,000/-.. Further, the complainant paid Rs. 90,000/- towards manual repair charges in addition to Rs.75,000/-for purchase of parts. All the bills were submitted to the OP; however, OP repudiated the claim on the plea that the driver

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top