ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant at the admission stage.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the allotment letter was issued on 22.03.2017 and as per the provisions of this allotment letter, the possession was to be taken within 90 days and at the expiry of this 90 days, the possession would be deemed to have been taken. The appellant got the completion certificate on 29.04.2017 and therefore, it is the argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that there was no delay in giving the possession because of the deemed provision in the allotment letter itself. The allotment letter further states that the allotment is on “as is where is basis”. The State Commission has also agreed that there was no delay in developing the plot and thus no deficiency on the part of the appellant. However, the State Commission has still awarded a compensation of Rs.30,000/- along with the order for giving possession to the complainant. The appellant is mainly aggrieved with the order of the State Commission for the award of compensation of Rs.30,000/-. The State Commission has held that there was no deficiency on the part of the appellant. Learned counsel has further s