SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA
Reliance Nippon Life Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Puni Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.S. Banthia, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the three orders dated 17.12.2019, 28.08.2020 and 31.08.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odissa (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.127 of 2019 alleging that these orders are arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a Complaint had been filed by the Respondent before the District Forum. The District Forum vide its order dated 03.09.2018 allowed the Complaint ex parte against the Petitioner holding that the Petitioner had failed to appear before it despite service of notice of the Complaint.

3. The Petitioner filed Appeal No.127 of 2019 before the State Commission wherein they had challenged the order of the District Forum on several grounds. The Appeal was delayed. An application for condonation of delay in filling the Appeal was filed. One of the arguments for condonation of delay was that they had not been properly served with the notice of the Complaint and that they had come to know of the filing of the Complaint only af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top