SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.GUPTA, S.K.NAIK
Tesol India – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh Patwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Jyoti Choudhary, Advocate.

ORDER :

S.K. Naik, Member

This is a bunch of six revision petitions, which have been filed by Tesol India, who was sole opposite party before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, U.T., Chandigarh (District Forum for short), against the orders dated 17th of March, 2010 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (State Commission for short). The State Commission has dismissed all the six appeals filed by the petitioner/opposite party by passing identical orders. We, therefore, propose to dispose of all the six revision petitions by this common order.

2. In brief, the facts of the cases, as alleged by the complainants, are that the petitioner/opposite party had published an advertisement in newspapers offering a course by the name of “Learn to Earn” with Overseas Job Guaranteed luring the prospective candidates by indicating their overseas placement with handsome pay package on completion of the programme so offered. On being attracted by the same, the complainants sought admission in the said course, deposited the fee prescribed and completed the course. The complainants allege that though they were issued certificates to this effe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top