SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, VINAY KUMAR
Varalakshmi Starch Industries (P) Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Man Rollo Generations India (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Complainant :Mr. Vipin Jai and Mr. Vipul Jai, Advocates.

ORDER :

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member

The key controversy pivots around the question is whether the complainant is a consumer? The facts to understand the problem are these. The complainant Varalakshmi Starch Industries (P) Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act 1956 and transacts the following business:

(i)

To manufacture, produce, refine, buy, sell, export, import or otherwise deal in all types of Tapioca and Maize starch, sago, glucose, dextrine, glues, dextrose and all kinds of Tapioca and Maize products.

(ii)

To manufacture, produce, refine, buy, sell, export, import or otherwise deal in all types of products manufactured out of tapioca and Maize.

(iii)

To carry on business of generating, selling, transmitting, distributing, supplying either directly or through others, electrical energy by using coal, lignite, wind energy, solar energy, tidal energy, wave energy, hydro energy and other methods for captive use or otherwise.

2. On 19.08.2009, the purchase agreement was entered into between the complainant and Man Ro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top