SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEBASIS BHATTACHARYA, JAGANNATH BAG
UCO Bank – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Ray – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Chittaranjan Bakshi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Tapan Kumar Mohanti and Ms. S. Roy Chowdhury, Advocates.

ORDER :

Debasis Bhattacharya, Member

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 10.3.2011 in Case No. 283/2010, passed by the learned District Forum, North 24 Parganas, the Manager, UCO Bank, Basirhat Branch has preferred this appeal.

2. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum has allowed the case of the Complainant in part ex parte with cost, and directed the OP Bank to pay compensation for a sum of Rs. 3,53,380 (Rupees three lakh fifty three thousand three hundred eighty) towards the value of the stolen ornaments to the Complainant, within one month from the date of the order. It further directed the OP Bank to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000 (Rupees one thousand) as litigation cost.

3. The case of the Complainant, in his petition of complaint, is that he opened a Savings Bank A/c in the names of himself and his wife, Mina Ray with the United Commercial Bank, Basirhat Branch, North 24 Parganas, on 16.1.2002, being A/c No. 13291. Incidentally, he booked one Locker with the said Bank on 12.6.2007 having No. 55, Cabin-B and Key No. 8858 in their joint names. He was allotted a surrendered Locker. He and his wife used to keep their golden ornaments of about 16.5 Bharis, compri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top