SURJIT SINGH, PREM CHAUHAN, VIJAY PAL KHACHI
Rajneesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
ORDER :
Surjit Singh, President
Appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 16.7.2014, of learned District Consumer Redressal Forum, Shimla, whereby his complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which he filed against the respondents, who are the functionaries of Punjab National Bank, has been dismissed, with the finding that there is no deficiency in service on the part of the respondents/opposite parties.
2. Appellant filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, in June, 2011, against the respondents alleging that he had a saving bank account No. 388900010053639 and that in the month of May 2010, he issued a cheque in favour of a person, which was returned with the endorsement that the account stood frozen. Appellant alleged that he had never been issued any show cause notice for freezing his account and that later on, he came to know that the account had been frozen on the basis of a complaint by a lady, that a sum of Rs. 68,600 had been illegally withdrawn by misusing her ATM card and the said amount of money had been credited in the aforesaid (frozen) account belonging to him.
3. Complaint was contested by the respondents, who sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.