ORDER :

Mr. Justice J.M. Malik, Presiding Member-This order shall decide three Revision Petitions by a common judgment. The Respondents/Complainants, namely; Raju Sen in Revision Petition No. 1754 of 2014, Sawarmal and Suresh Kumar Sharma in Revision Petition No. 1817 of 2014 and Suresh Kumar Sharma in Revision Petition No. 1818 of 2014 did not appear despite service and after accepting the litigation charges. The complainants/respondents named above, had filed the complaints before the District Forum. The District Forum allowed the complaints and the State Commission dismissed the appeals in limine.

2. Aggrieved by that order, all the three set of complainants named above have filed the three separate revision petitions. Although the facts and law involved there, is similar and the case will be decided by a common judgment, yet, we are trying to give separate facts of each case.

3. In all the three cases the above mentioned OPs made an attempt to purchase the flats through auction. In the case of Raju Sen, the complainant applied for a residential plot under the scheme of Kudi Bhagtasani in which the rate of bid was announced at Rs. 12,000 per metre initially. The said rate was propo