SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
N. K. Jain – Appellant
Versus
S. C. Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Dr. Sushil Kr. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Puneet Bhagat, Advocate.

ORDER :

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member-The brief facts of the case are that the complainant suffered chest pain on 19.11.1997 and consulted the OP/Dr. A.K. Jain, who took ECG and prescribed few medicines. Again on 22.11.1997, he went to OP who again advised antibiotics, anti-allergic and multivitamins. After six months, on 10.6.1998, the complainant suffered chest pain and he went Dr. R.K. Saran, King George Hospital, who advised strict bed rest, but the complainant got himself admitted in Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (hereinafter referred as ‘SGPGI’), Lucknow from 11.6.1998 to 27.6.1998. The doctors at SGPGI examined the ECG, which was taken by OP on 19.11.1997, that he suffered from Inferior wall myocardial infection (IWMI), which was not thrombolised that time. Finally, the complainant went Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad and underwent Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (hereinafter referred as ‘CABG’) on 2.7.1998. Therefore it was negligence by the OP who failed to read ECG and was unable to diagnose IWMI on 19.11.1997 which was further not thrombolised on the same day. The doctors at SGPGI and Apollo Hospital have also opined negligence on the part of OP 1.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top