GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, HARCHARAN SINGH GURAM
AMARJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
ORDER :
MR. GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. The appellant/complainant (hereinafter referred as “the complainant”) has filed the present appeal against the order dated 18.1.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridkot (hereinafter referred as “the District Forum”) in consumer complaint No. 69 dated 17.3.2011 vide which the learned President had partly allowed the complaint with a direction to OP No. 1 to pay a sum of Rs. 2 lacs as compensation to the complainant for causing mental tension and harassment and for deficiency in services whereas OP No. 4 was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 as compensation for not providing the information under Right to Information Act (in short ‘RTI’) and violation of PNDT Act along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of order till realization whereas two Members of the District Forum had dismissed the complaint.
2. The complaint was filed by the complainant under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short ‘the Act’) against the respondents on the allegations that she was pregnant and was diagnosed so by respondents Nos. 3 and 4. She visited Civil Hospital, Kotkapura under CR No. 4180 dated 28.10.2009 with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.