ORDER :

1. Having failed to satisfy the Competition Commission of India (the Commission) in forming prima facie opinion under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act (the Act), to order an investigation against alleged abuse of dominance by the respondent, the appellant has filed this appeal on 18.4.2016 against the order of the Commission dated 10.2.2016 in Case No. 96 of 2015.

2. The appellant, M/s. Meru Travels Solutions Private Limited is a group holding company which provides radio taxi services through its fully owned subsidiaries namely, Meru Travels Solutions Private Limited and V-Link Automotive Services Private Limited. Both these subsidiaries are engaged in business of providing radio taxi services under the brand names, Meru, Meru Genie and Meru Flexi respectively in 21 major cities across India. The appellant started its Delhi operations in March, 2008. Since 2012, appellant revised its business model and started providing radio taxi services through an aggregation model.

3. Respondent No. 2, M/s. Uber India Systems Private Limited is a company registered in India whereas Respondent Nos. 3 to 5, M/s. Uber BV, M/s. Uber International Holding BV (which holds 90% shares of Resp