SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NOUSHAD ALI
G. R. S. REDDY – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents:Mr. M. Pratap Reddy, Advocate.

ORDER :

NOUSHAD ALI, PRESIDENT

1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful complainant against the order dated 29.6.2015 in C.C.No.33/2015 passed by the District Forum, Kadapa.

2. The appellant/complainant purchased bus ticket (Ex.A.1) reserving seats for himself, his wife and his daughter to travel from Kadapa to Srisailam on 15.11.2014 at 1.45 a.m. Seat Nos. 3, 4 and 16 were reserved for them in Bus Service No. 6492 whose departure time was 1.45 hours. The complainant along with his wife and daughter reached the bus station well in advance by 1.15 a.m. After having waited for five minutes, he learnt from the announcer who was asleep by then that the bus had left the station before 1.30 hours. The announcer endorsed the said fact on the reverse of Ex.A.1 ticket. The complainant having thus missed the bus addressed Ex.A.2 notice dated 15.11.2014 to the 1st Respondent Regional Manager, APSRTC, Kadapa. He demanded refund of the fare for having deprived him of the journey. As there was no response, he addressed another letter, this time to both the respondents. He received reply dated 27.3.2015 from the 2nd Respondent Depot Manager marked as Ex. A.3. The 2nd Respondent expressed regrets

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top