GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL
Amanbir Singh Sarna – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the CP Act on the averments that the OPs launched their project under the name and style of Purab Premium Apartments, Sector 88, SAS Nagar. The complainant being eligible applied for one of the flat. Its total cost was Rs. 69 lacs. The allotment was on the basis of draw of lots. In the draw of lot, complainant was successful and Letter of Intent (hereinafter referred as LOI) dated 20.5.2012 was issued in favour of the complainant. A sum of Rs. 6.9 lacs equal to 10% of the cost was deposited along with application. In the LOI, OP demanded another amount of Rs. 13.80 lacs equal to 20% of the cost of the flat, which was deposited by the complainant. For the remaining period, schedule of payment was given by the OP and the complainant paid the amount as under:
| S. No. | Particulars | Dated | Annexure No. | Amount |
|
| Bank Draft | 18.6.2012 | C-3 | Rs. 13,80,000 |
| 4. | Bank Draft | 5.11.2012 | C-4 | Rs. 10,16,600 |
| 5. | Bank Draft | 20.5.2013 | C-5 | Rs. 9,71,750 |
| 6. | Bank Draft | 18.11.2013 | C-6 | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.