SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL
Amanbir Singh Sarna – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.S. Salar.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.B Menon, Mr. Anuj Kohli.

ORDER :

1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the CP Act on the averments that the OPs launched their project under the name and style of Purab Premium Apartments, Sector 88, SAS Nagar. The complainant being eligible applied for one of the flat. Its total cost was Rs. 69 lacs. The allotment was on the basis of draw of lots. In the draw of lot, complainant was successful and Letter of Intent (hereinafter referred as LOI) dated 20.5.2012 was issued in favour of the complainant. A sum of Rs. 6.9 lacs equal to 10% of the cost was deposited along with application. In the LOI, OP demanded another amount of Rs. 13.80 lacs equal to 20% of the cost of the flat, which was deposited by the complainant. For the remaining period, schedule of payment was given by the OP and the complainant paid the amount as under:

S. No.

Particulars

Dated

Annexure No.

Amount

 

Bank Draft

18.6.2012

C-3

Rs. 13,80,000

4.

Bank Draft

5.11.2012

C-4

Rs. 10,16,600

5.

Bank Draft

20.5.2013

C-5

Rs. 9,71,750

6.

Bank Draft

18.11.2013

C-6

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top