SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NAWAB SINGH, BALBIR SINGH
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Meena Chauhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. B.D. Bhatia.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sunil Kundu.

ORDER :

1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated July 28th, 2016 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sonipat (for short ‘the District Forum’).

2. Smt. Meena Chauhan-complainant (respondent herein) started construction work over a plot bearing No. F-138, TDI City, Kundli, Sonipat. At the time of construction, a temporary electricity connection having 1.00 KW load capacity was provided to the complainant by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (UHBVNL)-Opposite Party/appellant. After completing the construction work, the complainant was provided permanent domestic electricity connection in her premises having 15.00 KW load capacity bearing account No. RS-26-112-N. The complainant used to make payment of the electricity bills regularly. In the month of April 2015, the complainant received electricity bill issued on April 10 th, 2015 for payment of an amount of Rs. 1,01,915 including an amount of Rs. 95,623 which is mentioned as sundry charges in the electricity bill. The complainant requested the opposite parties to make correction in the electricity bill and for the time being, an amount of Rs. 7,000 was deposited regarding the above mentioned ele

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top