SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NAWAB SINGH, BALBIR SINGH, DIWAN SINGH CHAUHAN
Sudesh Behal – Appellant
Versus
Era Landmarks Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.D. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Advocate.

ORDER :

Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President (Oral)-Sudesh Behal-complainant, has filed the instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with the averments that on 22nd November, 2010, the complainant purchased Flat No. 902, 9th Floor, Tower D, Era Sky-Ville in Sector 68, Gurgaon from Era Landmarks-opposite parties (for short ‘Developer’). Flat Buyers Agreement dated 17th November, 2012 (Exhibit C-27) was executed between the complainant and the Developer. The basic sale price of the flat was Rs. 63,94,500. As per Clause 10.1 of the Buyers Agreement, the possession of the flat was to be offered within a period of 36 months (with a grace period of 6 months) from the date of execution of the agreement, that is, on or before 17.5.2016. In all, the complainant paid Rs. 44,56,318 to the Developer. The Developer did not complete the construction on the site. The Developer vide letter dated 14th May, 2015 had also shown its inability to complete the construction in time. The complainant requested to refund the deposited amount from the Developer but to no avail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top