SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.S.KLAR, SURINDER PAL KAUR
G. S. Gill – Appellant
Versus
Gurnam Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate.

ORDER :

J.S. Klar, Presiding Judicial Member

Challenge in this appeal by appellants is to order dated 17.5.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (in short the ‘District Forum’), accepting the complaint of respondent No. 1 of this appeal with cost of Rs. 30,000 against appellants of this appeal and dismissing it qua respondent Nos. 2 and 3 of this appeal by directing appellants to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 (Five lakh only) to respondent No. 1 of this appeal within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of order, failing which, the amount of Rs. 5,00,000 shall carry interest @ 12% p.a. till realization. The appellants of this appeal are opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 in the complaint before the District Forum and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 of this appeal are opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 therein and respondent No. 1 of this appeal is complainant therein and they be referred as such hereinafter for the sake of convenience.

2. Short facts of the complaint are that complainant filed complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, “the Act”) against OPs on the averments that he was suffering from chest pain, due to which he remained uneasy.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top