SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

REKHA GUPTA
P. P. Gambhir, Sanjeev Kumar Gambhir – Appellant
Versus
Omaxe Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Both petitioner in person.

ORDER :

Rekha Gupta, Presiding Member

The above noted Revision Petitions (R.P. Nos. 861 and 862 of 2017) have been filed by the Petitioners/Complainants against the impugned orders dated 6.12.2016, passed by Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi (for short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal Nos. 124 and 125 of 2014, respectively.

2. These Revision Petitions (R.P. Nos. 861 and 862 of 2017) have been filed by Petitioners, Mr. P.P. Gambhir and Sanjeev Kumar Gambhir, respectively against the orders dated 6.12.2017 passed in First Appeal Nos.124 and 125 of 2014 respectively. Since the facts of these Revision Petitions are similar, It is proposed to disposed of the same by a common order by taking the Revision Petition No. 861 of 2017 as a lead case.

3. Brief facts of the case as per Petitioner/Complainant are that that he had booked a flat in a project to be developed by the Respondent/Opposite Party at Pant Nagar (Rudrapur) Uttarakhand with an approximate super area of 878 sq. ft. and while booking the flat he had adopted the instalment linked plan and had paid Rs. 2,17,305 vide cheque dated 17.8.2006 against a receipt. The Respondent confirmed the allotment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top