SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NAWAB SINGH, BALBIR SINGH, DIWAN SINGH CHAUHAN
Parvesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Era Landmarks Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Complainants :Mr. R.D. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties :Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Advocate.

ORDER :

Nawab Singh, President

Parvesh Kumar and Sheela Devi-complainants, have filed the instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with the averments that on 30th May, 2012, Bimla Aggarwal booked Flat No. 1401, 14th Floor, Tower-J, Era SkyVille in Sector 68, Gurgaon with Era Landmarks Limited-opposite parties (for short ‘Developer’). Bimla Aggarwal transferred the said flat in favour of the complainants and their names were substituted in the record of Developer on August 20th, 2012 vide Exhibit C-28. Flat Buyers Agreement dated 7th December, 2012 (Exhibit C-29) was executed between the complainants and the Developer. The basic sale price of the flat was Rs. 59,06,910. As per Clause 10.1 of the Buyers Agreement, the possession of the flat was to be offered within a period of 36 months (with a grace period of 6 months) from the date of execution of the agreement, that is, on or before 7th June, 2016. In all, the complainants paid Rs. 16,82,053 to the Developer. The Developer did not complete the construction on the site. The Developer vide letter dated 14

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top