SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIJAI VARMA, RAJ KAMAL GUPTA
Abhishek Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Piyush Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. V.P. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Arun Tandan, Advocate.

ORDER :

Vijai Varma, Presiding Member

This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.8.2000, passed by the District Forum-I, Moradabad in complaint case No. 195 of 1998.

The facts leading to this appeal, in short, are that the respondent/complainant had purchased a photo copier machine manufactured by the respondent/OP No. 2. After 2 days of its purchase the complainant informed the appellant/OP No. 1 that the machine was not working properly whereupon the OP No. 1 assured that an engineer will come within a day or two on informing the OP No. 2. Thereafter, the machine was taken by the OP No. 1 and was sent to Delhi for repairs and it was returned back to the complainant on 20.8.1997 by the OP No. 1 saying that the machine has been fully repaired but again on 21.8.1997, the complainant complained about the machine which was not working properly then he was told that the machine will be sent to Delhi. The complainant, thereafter, waited for many months but the machine was not repaired despite the complainant making contacts with the OPs. Ultimately, the complainant got back his machine from the OPs and found that the some plate was missing from the photo copier mach

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top