SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Kumar Godara – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate
For the Respondent: Nemo

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against order dated 20.03.2015 in First Appeal No.244/2013 passed by Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”).

2. Alongwith the Revision Petition, the Petitioner has filed IA/5181/2015, an application for Condonation of delay of 27 days. Since the delay is not very huge, in the interest of justice, application is allowed and delay condoned.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the Respondent/Complainant obtained an Insurance Policy from the Petitioner/Opposite Party for his Bolero Car, bearing temporary registration No.PB-11-T-5101 from 20.06.2011 to 19.07.2011 for a sum assured of Rs.6,17,800/-. In the night of 28.07.2011, car of the Complainant was stolen from outside Geeta Guest House, Jodhpur. Complainant lodged an FIR on 29.07.2011. Police could not trace the vehicle and submitted a negative final report on 30.09.2011. Complainant submitted insurance claim with the Opposite Party/Insurance Company. Petitioner/Opposite Party repudiated the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top