SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
R. G. Residency Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sakshi Jindal – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal and Mr. Anunya Mehta, Advocates

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—This Appeal Execution is directed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) dated 29.01.2021 in EX-58/17, whereby the State Commission issued non-bailable warrants against the Appellants/Judgment Debtors.

2. State Commission, vide order dated 25.08.2017 passed in CC/281/2016 directed the Opposite Party to refund an amount of Rs.48,07,542/- alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of payment till the date of refund within 30 days. Since the Appellant/Opposite Party failed to comply with the order dated 25.08.2017, the Complainant/Decree Holder filed Execution Petition before the State Commission. In the Execution Petition, on 29.01.2021, the State Commission passed the following order: -

“Sh. Mehta, Advocate Counsel for JD states that he has already moved an application dated 25.01.2021 for extension of time to make the payment. Counsel for DH sates that he has not received copy of the said application.

Counsel for JD states that JD does not have amount to comply with the order. The judgment was passed on 25.08.2017. More than 3 years have passed. The JD wan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top