DINESH SINGH
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Lal Meena – Respondent
ORDER
Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner insurance co.
Perused the material on record.
2. This case relates to repudiation of an insurance claim re the theft of a tractor.
3. The District Forum vide its Order dated 16.02.2012 allowed the complaint. It directed the opposite party no. 1 insurance co. (the petitioner herein) to pay the insured value of Rs. 3,30,000/- and cost of litigation of Rs. 5,000/- (total Rs. 3,35,000/-) to the complainant within two months, failing which the total amount will carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the award.
The State Commission vide its Order dated 20.08.2015 dismissed the appeal.
This revision petition was filed on 13.10.2015 in challenge to the said Order dated 20.08.2015 of the State Commission.
4. The claim was repudiated on the sole ground of delay in intimation to the insurance co.
It is however admitted that after the theft of the insured tractor on 17/18.09.2008, the complainant made an application in the court on 19.09.2008, on direction of the court an FIR under Section 379 IPC Punishment for theft was lodged by the police on 29.09.2008, the police investigated the case, it did not find t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.