SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA
New India Assurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kishore Chandra Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Abhishek K. Gola, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—This order shall dispose of all the above mentioned Revision Petitions since the facts and point of law in question involved in them is the same. Facts are being taken from Revision Petition No.626 of 2020.

1. The present Revision Petition, under Section 58 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 22.01.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, Cuttack (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.218 of 2010. The said Appeal was filed by the Petitioner challenging the order dated 29.01.2020 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Sundargarh-II, Rourkela (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.186 of 2006 filed by the Complainant. The Complaint was allowed by the District Forum.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Respondent/Complainant being the Managing Director of M/s KCS Private Limited had filed the Complaint. The Complainant in order to carry out some work on behalf of the industry NALCO, Damanjodi and on behalf of the NALCO, purchased some machinery and materials from different places. He then boo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top