SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA
ICICI Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Senapathi Koti – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 58 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the order 23.09.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Andhra Pradesh (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.314 of 2017 which was filed against the order dated 13.04.2017 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, Visakhapatnam (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.184 of 2016.

2. The brief admitted facts of the case are that the deceased, i.e. son of the Complainant had a saving bank account with the Petitioner. He was issued a debit card which was having an insurance coverage of Rs.10 Lakhs in case of personal accident. Unfortunately, he died in a road accident and an FIR under Sections 304(A), 338, 337 and 279 of IPC was registered. The Complainant claimed the benefit of the insurance under the debit card and wrote a letter to the Petitioner. In reply, the Petitioner took the stand that they had not received any claim of the Complainant and advised him to approach other branch of the Bank. Even after approaching the other branch of the Petitioner, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top