SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Yadav Builders – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Manish Gandhi, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 21(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 07.08.2014 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Punjab, Chandigarh in Appeal No. 1993/2010.

2. The Complainant /Respondent was the owner of Tata Trailer bearing Registration No. PB-30D-8999 insured with the Opposite Party, vide Policy Number 360501/31/08/01/00000719. According to the Complainant, the vehicle met with an accident on 16.03.2009. The Complainant informed the Opposite Party and filed the claim. The Opposite Party appointed a Surveyor and Loss Assessor for assessing the loss. Though the Surveyor calculated the loss of Rs.6,18,500/-, the Opposite Party, vide letter dated 02.12.2009 repudiated the claim on the ground that the driver was holding a fake driving licence. The Complainant, thereupon, field a Complaint before the District Forum with the following prayer: -

“The Complaint of the Complaint be accepted and opposite party be directed to release amount of rupees 6,18,500/- along with interest at the rate of 18% detailed in the head note of Complaint and further to pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top