SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH
Balaji Builders & Developers – Appellant
Versus
J. Renuga – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Aditya Kapoor, Advocate

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—These sixteen (16) Revision Petitions have been filed under Section 58(1)(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 in challenge to the Order dated 09.11.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karnataka (the ‘State Commission’) in F.A.s No. 653 to 668 of 2019, arising out of the Order dated 20.07.2018 in C.C.s No. 1246/2016, No. 1274/2016, No. 1262/2016, No. 1598/2016, No. 1267/2016, No. 1271/2016, No. 1260/2016, No. 1596/2016, No. 1261/2016, No. 1263/2016, No. 1259/2016, No. 1595/2016, No. 1247/2016, No. 1597/2016, No. 1265/2016 and No. 1273 of 2016 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru (the ‘District Commission’).

2. Heard arguments on admission from Mr. Aditya Kapoor, learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

Perused the material on record, including inter alia the Order dated 20.07.2018 of the District Commission, the Order dated 09.11.2020 of the State Commission and the Petition.

3. These sixteen (16) Petitions have been filed against a common order (the Order dated 09.11.2020) of the State Commission, similar facts and same questions of law are involved.

The sixteen (16) Petitions are being disposed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top