SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH
Parsvnath Developers Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Garg – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate, (through video conferencing)

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—This relates to a builder-buyer dispute.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant builder co.

Perused the material on record, including inter alia the impugned Order dated 01.10.2020 of the State Commission and the memorandum of appeal.

3. In the interest of justice, to provide fair opportunity to the appellant builder co., to settle the matter on merit, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

4. The award made by the State Commission vide its Order of 01.10.2020 reads as below:

15. In view of my above discussion, this complaint is allowed and following directions are issued to the opposite parties:-

(i) to deliver physical possession of the flat in question, complete in all respects along with all the promised amenities and ‘Completion and Occupation Certificates’ and all the approvals from the concerned competent authority subject to payment of balance sale consideration of the flat, if any, without interest or penal interest;

(ii) to execute the sale/conveyance deed and get the same registered in the names of the complainants for which the expenses shall be borne by them.

(iii) to pay compensation for causing financial loss and d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top