SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Beej Bhandar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Rit Arora and Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Advocate

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—Vide this order I propose to dispose of the above-mentioned Revision Petitions since the common questions of law and facts are involved in all these Revision Petitions. These Revisions Petitions are arising out of the common order of the State Commission dated 04.04.2019. Vide the impugned order the State Commission had set aside the order of the District Forum dated 28.08.2018 and dismissed all the Complaints. Aggrieved by the order present Revision Petitions have been filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioners (hereinafter called the ‘farmers’) are farmers by profession and had been toiling the agricultural land since long. They had purchased groundnut seeds of the quality Tag 37A from the Respondent. Their contention was that the Respondents had at the time of purchase of the seeds, assured them that the seeds were of superior quality and the crops will completely ripe within 100-110 days. They had also alleged that after sowing the seeds they had applied the pesticides and took proper care but when they noticed that the seeds have not developed even after 100 days. They all then filed a joint complaint before Collector,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top